Re: BS7799 and ISO17799
From: Roy Madden (roy@linksheaven.com)Date: 07/27/01
- Previous message: CJ Oakwood: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- In reply to: Carmelo Floridia: "BS7799 and ISO17799"
- Next in thread: Julian Curmi: "Re: BS7799 and ISO17799"
- Next in thread: Pete Sherwood: "Re: A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:42:17 +0100 From: Roy Madden <roy@linksheaven.com> Message-ID: <1793972652.20010727194217@linksheaven.com> To: "Carmelo Floridia" <cfloridia@lex.unict.it> Subject: Re: BS7799 and ISO17799
Part 1 of BS7799 was submitted to the ISO for evaluation as an
international standard. ISO17799 is the result, which is basically
BS7799 Part 1 with a number of minor changes.
Roy
On Friday, July 27, 2001, 9:20:23 AM, Carmelo wrote:
> What's the difference between BS7799 and ISO17799?
> best regards Carmelo
- Previous message: CJ Oakwood: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- In reply to: Carmelo Floridia: "BS7799 and ISO17799"
- Next in thread: Julian Curmi: "Re: BS7799 and ISO17799"
- Next in thread: Pete Sherwood: "Re: A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|