Re: Remote Administration on W2K
From: dreamer@darkness.grDate: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Sascha Busse: "Fw: Qmail vs. postfix"
- In reply to: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Brian McClory: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Igor Kurtovic: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Reply: Brian McClory: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:35:00 +0300 (EEST) From: <dreamer@darkness.gr> To: Ryan McDonnell <ryan@ocwebsolution.com> Subject: Re: Remote Administration on W2K Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107271428540.26563-100000@darkness.darkness.gr>
Greetings,
Try VNC, it is good, and gives you real administrative
priviledges. Using Terminal Services you may encounter problems installing
services, seems like you are not in "real" administrative mode. And for
better results, metaframe.
Metaframe from citrix @ http://www.citrix.com/products/metaframe/
VNC @ http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Ryan McDonnell wrote:
> I wanted to get an idea of what full-system remote administration programs
> people recommend for internet servers. Mainly I've found most use
> PCAnywhere or Terminal Services... curious as to which poses less of a
> security risk, quicker speed, server resources used, etc.
>
> TIA,
>
> Ryan McDonnnell
>
- Previous message: Sascha Busse: "Fw: Qmail vs. postfix"
- In reply to: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Brian McClory: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Igor Kurtovic: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Reply: Brian McClory: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|