RE: Remote Administration on W2K
From: De ***, Joost (Joost.De.***@eu.sony.com)Date: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Julian Curmi: "Re: Computer policies"
- Maybe in reply to: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: dreamer@darkness.gr: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <EEFEC55B12263345A7A2F3066E3841C0E845E6@BEITE0MERMSX02> From: "De ***, Joost" <Joost.De.***@eu.sony.com> To: "'Ryan McDonnell'" <ryan@ocwebsolution.com>, SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Remote Administration on W2K Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:17:51 +0100
I use Funk proxy remote control
www.funk.com
It's fast and powerful, I really love it, and I've been told it's more
secure then PCAnywhere.
You can download the trial, so I advice you try it.
.
|oos|~
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan McDonnell [mailto:ryan@ocwebsolution.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:57 PM
To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: Remote Administration on W2K
I wanted to get an idea of what full-system remote administration programs
people recommend for internet servers. Mainly I've found most use
PCAnywhere or Terminal Services... curious as to which poses less of a
security risk, quicker speed, server resources used, etc.
TIA,
Ryan McDonnnell
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly
the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony.
(03)
**********************************************************************
- Previous message: Julian Curmi: "Re: Computer policies"
- Maybe in reply to: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: dreamer@darkness.gr: "Re: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]