RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert.....
From: thin-line@ftb.comDate: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Adrien de Beaupre: "Re: Computer policies"
- Maybe in reply to: EPiC: "Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Stan Lee (OBU-MY): "RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Dom De Vitto: "RE: A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200107262242.RAA24889@dns2.ftbonline.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:30:26 -0500 From: thin-line@ftb.com Subject: RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert..... To: vul-dev@securityfocus.com, security-basics@securityfocus.com
Don't forget to mention that GroupShield should be set to scan ~all~ file extensions (or you can add .lnk and .pif, which aren't on the list by default) since SirCam basically has a random executable file extension.
DAT 4148 protects against SirCam and SuperDAT 4149 automatically adds the two extra file extensions to the scan list.
I'm not sure what the benefits of DAT 4150 are yet.
We are using Exchange Server 5.5 SP 3 (5.5.2650.21) with GroupShield 4.5 SP 1 (4.5.572.128) with Scanning Engine 4.1.40 (and a couple of hotfixes thrown in there).
Thank you!
Jason R DePriest, GSEC, GCFW
Intranet Web Administrator II
voice - (901) 523-5975
fax - (901) 523-5527
- Previous message: Adrien de Beaupre: "Re: Computer policies"
- Maybe in reply to: EPiC: "Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Stan Lee (OBU-MY): "RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Dom De Vitto: "RE: A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]