Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP
From: Jim (mlist@budget.co.nz)Date: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- In reply to: David Knaack: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: kath: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: kath: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: David Hickman: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <001f01c11626$40aafac0$0f01a8c0@jimamd> From: "Jim" <mlist@budget.co.nz> To: <SECURITY-BASICS@SECURITYFOCUS.COM> Subject: Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:56:48 +1200
> I'm curious.. Presuming XP is similar to NT in that normal user accounts
> are not the same as admin accounts, and it can be configured so that only
> admin accounts can do things like install drivers or otherwise modify the
> system, could Microsoft set things up so that only accounts specificly
> granted the rights to do so could open raw sockets?
This could definitely be done. Whether it would solve the problem people
are complaining about, I don't know. Given the huge number of
vulnerabilities in MS OS's, getting access to a priveledged account in order
to create the raw sockets would probably not be an issue, merely another
step on the way. I'm assuming the ability to create raw sockets wouldn't be
restricted for an administrator, which would likely be the first account to
be cracked anyway.
> This would allow apps that need raw sockets (which are generally few and
> far between for regular users) the capability without giving every trojan
> the same ability.
If the ability is there, people will find a way to use it and exploit it.
> Surely the folks at microsoft have thought of this solution. Do they
> simply not care? Have they said that they won't do this?
I'm not sure that Microsoft don't CARE about security, but it's certainly
not foremost in their mind when they design their products.
-----------------------------------------------
This message is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not read or do anything else with this message.
If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately by return email and destroy this email. Thank you.
- Previous message: Ryan McDonnell: "Remote Administration on W2K"
- In reply to: David Knaack: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: kath: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: kath: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: David Hickman: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|