RE: Port 1145
From: Christopher W. Lancaster (chris@brainlink.com)Date: 07/26/01
- Previous message: Nathan Cook: "Re: Qmail vs. postfix"
- In reply to: Gregory_DeGennaro@csaa.com: "Port 1145"
- Next in thread: Kimberly Anne McKinnis: "Re: Port 1145"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Christopher W. Lancaster" <chris@brainlink.com> To: <Gregory_DeGennaro@csaa.com> Subject: RE: Port 1145 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:16:58 -0400 Message-ID: <FDEIKKFGNHLDOAIOAEGLGEAFCAAA.chris@brainlink.com>
I dont know what you mean by a common exploit... that port is not a standard
port number, as opposed to 21 for ftp, 22 for ssh, 23 for telnet, 80 for
http etc...
I am not aware of anything relating to that particular port and was unable
to find any information in a pretty extensive search...perhaps if you could
provide some more specific information, such as if this is based on an
attack you are experiencing, the relevant logs or something a bit more
substantial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory_DeGennaro@csaa.com [mailto:Gregory_DeGennaro@csaa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 18:48
To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: Port 1145
Anyone know what common exploit is on port 1145?
Thank you,
Greg
---------------------------------
Christopher W. Lancaster
+ http://www.cormani.net
+ BrainLink International
- System Administration
- Web Development
---------------------------------
- Previous message: Nathan Cook: "Re: Qmail vs. postfix"
- In reply to: Gregory_DeGennaro@csaa.com: "Port 1145"
- Next in thread: Kimberly Anne McKinnis: "Re: Port 1145"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
