RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP
From: David Knaack (dknaack@rdtech.com)Date: 07/25/01
- Previous message: Kimberly Anne McKinnis: "Re:Sircam"
- In reply to: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:12:51 -0500 (CDT) From: David Knaack <dknaack@rdtech.com> To: Jeff Smith <JSmith@Dentrix.com> Subject: RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107251606180.1258-100000@arthur.rdtech.com>
I'm curious.. Presuming XP is similar to NT in that normal user accounts
are not the same as admin accounts, and it can be configured so that only
admin accounts can do things like install drivers or otherwise modify the
system, could Microsoft set things up so that only accounts specificly
granted the rights to do so could open raw sockets?
This would allow apps that need raw sockets (which are generally few and
far between for regular users) the capability without giving every trojan
the same ability.
Surely the folks at microsoft have thought of this solution. Do they
simply not care? Have they said that they won't do this?
DK
-- If I want your website to make sound, I'll lick my finger and rub it against my screen.On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jeff Smith wrote: > Windows 9x/ME tend to draw a more mom and > pop type of crowd. They dodn't care about TCP stacks, fragmentation, secotr > size, etc. "MOST" windows user what to read their email, surf the web, open > elf bowling, and the latest flash program.
- Previous message: Kimberly Anne McKinnis: "Re:Sircam"
- In reply to: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Next in thread: Jim: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Reply: Jim: "Re: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]