Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers
From: Kronos (Kronos@datastreamcowboys.net)Date: 07/25/01
- Previous message: horape@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- In reply to: Bill Benner: "Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010725000907.00afcda8@mail.lcc.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:10:11 -0500 To: "Bill Benner" <bill.benner@pmic.com> From: Kronos <Kronos@datastreamcowboys.net> Subject: Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers
we been using Zend Technologies Zues Webserver on linux.. it runs beautifully
At 04:16 PM 7/23/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Our company has searched in vain for an analytical (vs. marketative)
>comparative analysis (strengths and weaknesses) of Web-servers on
>various platforms. Especially interested in Apache on Linux (or Unix),
>Apache on NT, IIS on NT.
>
>Has anyone run across such informatino that is not highly biased?
>
>Thanks in advance for any information,
>Bill Benner
- Previous message: horape@tinuviel.compendium.net.ar: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- In reply to: Bill Benner: "Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Comparative Analysis of Web Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
