Re: double NAT
From: Ulrich Keil (ulrich@der-keiler.de)Date: 07/24/01
- Previous message: Kevin Brown: "RE: TPF log"
- Maybe in reply to: Kirk Brady: "double NAT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:03:11 -0000 To: <kbrady22@iprimus.com.au> Subject: Re: double NAT From: "Ulrich Keil" <ulrich@der-keiler.de> Message-Id: <20010724000311.D3071138C1@mail.der-keiler.de>
Hi Kirk!
I have to agree Sven:
It is absolutely no problem to do as often nat as you want.
If you search information about this:
Any NAT-HOWTO matches this topic, because it doesnt matter if your
"NATing"-Firewall uses a "real" Gateway as target or an Gateway-Router who
does also NAT. The Configuration of the devices is (in theory!) the same.
Ulrich
Want to double your drivespace? Delete Windows!
>Quoting Kirk Brady (kbrady22@iprimus.com.au):
>>
>> this may be a stupid q to some but i was just wondering that if you have
>> a router connected to the net that performs NAT, and then a firewall
>> connected to the router that performs NAT as well, do all user requests
>> that are sent then get double NAT'd or does this setup not work?
>
>I have a similar configuration running @ home.
>
>Internet (DSL) - NAT-Router (Dial-on-demand) - Demil. Zone - File-Server(NAT)
>- Home-Net
>
>The DMZ (10.1.2.0/24) if for the Laptops that Friends bring with them.
>
>The File-Server offers FTP/SMB for the internal net (192.168.1.0/24) and
>does NAT.
>
>So my "Firewall" consists of 2 packet-filters with NAT and a DMZ.
>
>> once again im sorry if this seems stupid to some, but its been
>>bugging me for a while and i havent found anything that tells me.
>I had no big problems setting this up on LinuX.
>
>HTH
> Sven
- Previous message: Kevin Brown: "RE: TPF log"
- Maybe in reply to: Kirk Brady: "double NAT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
