RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time.
From: c0ncept (c0ncept@hushmail.com)Date: 07/19/01
- Previous message: Mark L. Jackson: "RE: NT "net use" Malfunctions"
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: eEye Digital Security: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: emerson.c.tan@ca.andersen.com: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: Marc Maiffret: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: josh abulamhammedramashi: "A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "c0ncept" <c0ncept@hushmail.com> To: "Vuln-Dev" <vuln-dev@securityfocus.com>, "SECURITY-BASICS" <SECURITY-BASICS@SECURITYFOCUS.COM> Subject: RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time. Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:36:15 -0700 Message-ID: <LBEIKDLIOKLBDBBFLIDKAEOACCAA.c0ncept@hushmail.com>
How many confirmed infections are setting on 410+ Meg connections?
How many of them have systems busses even capable of saturating multiple
infections?
--c0ncept
[snip]
:Remember, each host can be infected multiple times, meaning that a single
:host can send 410MB * # of infections.
[snip]
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Maiffret [mailto:marc@eeye.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:55 PM
To: Vuln-Dev; SECURITY-BASICS
Subject: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time.
Thanks to Eric from Symantec for tossing us a note about the worm being Date
based and not Time based.
We made an error in our last analysis and said the worm would start
attacking whitehouse.gov based on a certain time. In reality its based on a
date (the 20th UTC) which is tomorrow.
If the worm infects your system between the 1st and the 19th it will attempt
to deface the infected servers web page or try to propogate itself to other
systems. On the 20th all infected threads will attempt to attack
www.whitehouse.gov. This seems to continue until the worm is removed from
the infected system.
Any new infection that happens between the 20th and 28th will most likely be
someone "hand infecting" your system as all other worms should be attacking
whitehouse.gov. If for some reason you are infected between the 20th and the
28th then the worm will begin attacking whitehouse.gov without trying to
infect other systems. This attack will continue indefinitly.
The following are rough numbers, but we felt that it was important to
illustrate the affects this worm can _possibly_ have.
The worm has a timeline like this:
day of the month:
1-19: infect other hosts using the worm
20-27: attack whitehouse.gov forever
28-end of month: eternal sleep
Presumably, this could restart at any point in a new month again.
Also, some stats for the attack:
Each infection has 100 threads
Each thread is going to send about 100k, a byte at a time, which means you
have a (40 for ip + 1 for each byte) which means you have 4.1 megs of data
per thread
100 threads * 4.1megs = 410 Megabytes
This will be repeated again every 4.5 hours or so
Remember, each host can be infected multiple times, meaning that a single
host can send 410MB * # of infections.
We have had reports between 15 thousand and 196 thousand unique hosts
infected with the "Code Red" worm. However, there has been cross infection
and we have heard reports of at least 300+ thousand infections/instances
(machines with multiple infections etc..) of this worm.
If there are 300 thousand infections then that means you have (300,000 * 410
megabytes) that is going to be attempted to be flooded against
whitehouse.gov every 4 and a half hours. If this is true and the worm "works
as advertised" then the fact that whitehouse.gov goes offline is only the
begining of what _can_ possibly happen...
----I am actually writing this part of the eMail about 45 minutes after the first part because our Internet connection here in california has been going up and down. We have also heard reports of internet connectivity going down in parts of northern california and new york.
Signed, eEye Digital Security T.949.349.9062 F.949.349.9538 http://eEye.com/Retina - Network Security Scanner http://eEye.com/Iris - Network Traffic Analyzer http://eEye.com/SecureIIS - Stop known and unknown IIS vulnerabilities
- Previous message: Mark L. Jackson: "RE: NT "net use" Malfunctions"
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: eEye Digital Security: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: emerson.c.tan@ca.andersen.com: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: Marc Maiffret: "RE: Update to "Code Red" Worm. Its a date bomb, not time."
- Reply: josh abulamhammedramashi: "A code red that could bring down the net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|