Re: bill gates' claim about security vulnerabilities per LOC inUnix versus Windows

From: Kurt Seifried (bt_at_seifried.org)
Date: 11/05/03

  • Next message: Kenneth R. van Wyk: "Re: bill gates' claim about security vulnerabilities per LOC inUnix versus Windows" 
    To: "Cobus Neethling" <cobus@cknet.co.za>, <secprog@securityfocus.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:39:36 -0700

    That mi2g study was shown to be complete garbage, their methodology was
    junk. They counted Linux sites hosting multiple websites as multiple
    compormises.

    Kurt Seifried, kurt@seifried.org
    A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF
    AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574
    http://seifried.org/security/

  • Next message: Kenneth R. van Wyk: "Re: bill gates' claim about security vulnerabilities per LOC inUnix versus Windows"