Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?
From: Andrew Griffiths (andrewg@d2.net.au)
Date: 11/19/02
- Previous message: Alec Kosky: "Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Next in thread: Andrew Dalgleish: "Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:22:51 +1100 From: Andrew Griffiths <andrewg@d2.net.au> To: Frank Knobbe <fknobbe@knobbeits.com>
Frank Knobbe wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 17:10, Andrew Griffiths wrote:
>
>
>>Another thing to use is consistency, for example,
>>
> Of course in your example you allow dst to overflow in the strncpy.
> Using
> strncpy(dst, user_supplied_data, sizeof(dst)-1);
> would have prevented that if my math is correct.
>
Yup, hence the need for consistency when dealing with the -1 in
calcuations, etc.
Sincerely,
Andrew Griffiths
- Next message: Steven M. Christey: "RE: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Previous message: Alec Kosky: "Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Next in thread: Andrew Dalgleish: "Re: Are bad developer libraries the problem with M$ software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]