Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: Chip Panarchy <forumanarchy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:19:09 +1100
Hello
I have noticed recently that most cafés which offer Free WiFi do so,
not with a Wireless Encryption Method (WEP, WPA, WPA2, LEAP etc.) but
with a Forced-Proxy Redirect. (usually https with 128-bit encryption)
(I'm sure there's a better way of saying 'Forced-Proxy Redirect'...)
What are the Security implications of using the Forced-Proxy Redirect
method rather than a Wireless Encryption Method?
Does the traffic still get tunnelled securely?
What are the advantages & disadvantages when comparing these two Design choices?
Please alleviate my concerns.
Thanks in advance,
Chip D. Panarchy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board
Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.
http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: debiantech
- RE: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: Malick Sy
- Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: Jon Janego
- Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: Zaki Akhmad
- Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- From: Tim
- Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- Prev by Date: hping cheatsheet
- Next by Date: [cansecwest :: pentesters] Advanced PHP Hacking
- Previous by thread: hping cheatsheet
- Next by thread: Re: Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|