Re: Port Scanning Issues
- From: Vijay <zion.den@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:24:48 +1000
Hi Chaidre,
You could use the Connect scan option in nmap to get a more reliable scan. saying that i just realize that there are firewalls/load balancers that will respond with a SYN-ACK for every port, in that case i would say only when you send a data part of the connection after the ACK will you know if the port is really open. (people correct me if i am wrong). Hope it was of some help.
Regards
Vijay
crumdub12@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
A Chairde,
Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.
1. Using Superscan4 , I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I
get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port report, no attempt made to open any ports ... , when get open ports , I always get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes around 16 hours to finish.
2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool, any ideas why, how do I find out real ports open.. differences can be 10,000 ports
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Port Scanning Issues
- From: crumdub12
- Port Scanning Issues
- Prev by Date: Re: Port Scanning Issues
- Next by Date: Re: Port Scanning Issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Port Scanning Issues
- Next by thread: Re: Port Scanning Issues
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|