Re: Experiences with company nCircle and their IP360 product
From: Tom Stracener (strace_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/25/05
- Previous message: Frederic Charpentier: "Re: Application Security Scanning"
- In reply to: Bongers, Coen: "Experiences with company nCircle and their IP360 product"
- Next in thread: Byron Sonne: "Re: Experiences with company nCircle and their IP360 product"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:10:14 -0600 To: "Bongers, Coen" <coen.bongers@logicacmg.com>
Coen,
On the issue of unique or distinguishing features I would comment on
nCircle's quantitative risk metrics for vulnerabilities. I created the
formulas for this system back in 1999, and worked with other founding
members to further refine and enhance the system over the next couple
of years. Since then nCircle has continued to make modifications and
improvements to the core risk analysis algorithms, and the result has
been the development of a highly scalable risk analysis metric that
allows you to view the risk of vulnerabilities, hosts, and networks at
a glance.
To help you understand the technical premises of vulnerability
metrics, you can think of a vulnerability as having a penetration
depth, to what degree does a successful attack correlate with elevated
privileges. A sophistication factor, how difficult is it to exploit
the vulnerability, what types of exploits, tools, worms, or exploit
frameworks exist for the issue. An attack vector, how is the
vulnerability exploited. Also, what is the vulnerability life-cycle
state in relation to time. In essence, vulnerability risk is sort of
parabolic over time, although with the delayed rate of patching and
long-term persistence of vulnerabilities, the curve is less parabolic
than you would think.
These are just a few of the important assumptions. The importance or
critically of the system on which a vulnerability is resident, the
relation of the vulnerability to the network perimeter, etc., are also
key factors. This should give you an idea of the advantage of using
quantitative metrics in risk analysis, because you get a weighted
generalization of all these factors with the benefit of granularity
and succinct mathematical expression. High scoring systems and
networks can then get your first attention, a significant advancement
over having lists of thousands of low/medium/high qualitative labels.
I don't know the extent to which IP360 still uses the factors above,
but if you have an opportunity to view its output and reporting, know
that the vulnerability and network scoring metrics were not technical
wingdings tacked on at the behest of marketing -- but core technical
features that have undergone years of serious scrutiny and refinement.
Mike Murray has also done some amazing work on vulnerability signature
precision. Be sure to check it out:
http://www.ncircle.com/pdf/papers/nCircle_Precision_Metrics.pdf
Hope my comments interest you.
-Tom
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:
Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
Download Trial at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Frederic Charpentier: "Re: Application Security Scanning"
- In reply to: Bongers, Coen: "Experiences with company nCircle and their IP360 product"
- Next in thread: Byron Sonne: "Re: Experiences with company nCircle and their IP360 product"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
