RE: Interesting conviction

From: Craig Wright (cwright_at_bdosyd.com.au)
Date: 10/10/05

  • Next message: Craig Wright: "RE: Interesting conviction"
    Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:13:11 +1000
    To: <"lists AT dawes DOT za DOT net"@smtp.enginuiti.com>
    
    

    > Mr Cuthbert was simply attempting to verify the security of an
    institution that he had decided to entrust his credit card details to.

    First - this is not possible using a blind pen test anyway - this would
    give no idea of the database security or internal practices - so this
    excuse has zero merit to start with.

    It is easy to make excuses when you are caught - the issue is that he
    was caught and as such was likely to have done this on more than this
    occasion. As such what are the motives - profit maybe - "Hello I broke
    into your site and it is not secure, for $xxxx I will tell you how to
    fix it" (which is extortion by the way and caries an even greater
    penalty).

    For this to be a professional industry - we all need to act
    professionally - this is not a professional act.

    Will he be rewarded with a contract on the speaking circuit like Mitnick
    - that is another question? When we stop acting like cowboys and stop
    thinking of these people as heroes rather than the scum they are, we may
    get somewhere and be considered professionals.

    Craig

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Rogan Dawes [mailto:discard@dawes.za.net]
    Sent: 10 October 2005 1:40
    To: Mike Messick
    Cc: jay.tomas@infosecguru.com; pen-test@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Re: Interesting conviction

    Mike Messick wrote:
    > You're quite right! ;-)
    >
    > Here's mine:
    >
    > I think the article's editorial comments about causing problems for
    > security professional and penetration testing are pure crap.
    >
    [snip]

    >
    > Most laws are written with intent in mind. That Mr. Cutbert didn't
    > intend to do anything bad once he got in is really immaterial - that
    > he *intended to gain entry in an unauthorized fashion* is what
    > constituted the violation and his subsequent conviction.

    [snip]
    >
    > Just because you don't steal the TV after you crowbar the front door
    > open doesn't mean you won't go to prison for unlawful entry. Or not
    > get shot by the owner (in some states). The fact that you don't have
    > permission to be there in the first place is what matters (at least
    under current law).
    >

    Mr Cuthbert was simply attempting to verify the security of an
    institution that he had decided to entrust his credit card details to.

    Granted, one should not try to break into the vault of a bank to check
    their security, but I think that his intent was somewhat closer to
    rattling the lock on the safety deposit box after dropping your money
    in, to make sure that someone else can't just come along and help
    themself.

    Rogan

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ------
    Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:

    Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on
    your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts,
    forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down
    servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website
    for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web
    attacks before hackers do!
    Download Trial at:

    http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -------

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:

    Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
    website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
    login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
    futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
    to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
    Download Trial at:

    http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Craig Wright: "RE: Interesting conviction"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking
      ... This damages all security professionals. ... Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking ... "advanced societies" will have no clue about how remote computer attacks ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Re: Cracking WEP and WPA keys
      ... SecurityFocus wi-fi security mailing list. ... >>802.11G PCMCIA card, and the Linux server was running Samba to talk to ... >>Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: ... Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • RE: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking
      ... Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking ... To learn computer / network security is expensive and the ... "advanced societies" will have no clue about how remote computer attacks ... will create a generation of ignorant security professionals. ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • RE: Pen-Test and Social Engineering
      ... "see...your network security is penetrable". ... Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: ... Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your ... Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • RE: Pen-Test and Social Engineering
      ... "see...your network security is penetrable". ... Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: ... Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your ... Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, ...
      (Pen-Test)