Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance
From: Julio Uricari (uricari_at_gmail.com)
Date: 08/24/05
- Previous message: Irene Abezgauz: "RE: Netcat VS 'real' clients"
- In reply to: Stefano Zanero: "Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Next in thread: tervanp_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Maybe reply: tervanp_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:26:08 -0300 To: Stefano Zanero <s.zanero@securenetwork.it>
a time ago I saw and analyse Qualys and in my opinion it has too many
false possitives, for instance some patches that seems to be missing ,
but when you go to check the server thay era already installed., but
its just a subjective opinion.
Sorry for my english.
LIUX
On 8/24/05, Stefano Zanero <s.zanero@securenetwork.it> wrote:
> The products from the Italian company e-Maze do just the same:
> http://www.emaze.net/English/products/index.htm
>
> I agree with your concerns regarding the transmission of such sensitive
> data to an outsourcer, in particular for entities with strict auditing
> regulations.
>
> In addition, I find (as always) that calling a simple automated scan a
> "Vulnerability assessment", "Risk assessment" or even a "Penetration
> test" (sigh) is an offense for anybody who professionally engages in
> these activities.
>
> Best,
> Stefano Zanero
> ---------------------------
> Secure Network S.r.l.
> www.securenetwork.it
>
- Previous message: Irene Abezgauz: "RE: Netcat VS 'real' clients"
- In reply to: Stefano Zanero: "Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Next in thread: tervanp_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Maybe reply: tervanp_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Re: QualysGuard - VA/PT appliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|