Re: Core Impact
From: Daniele Milan (milan.daniele_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/24/05
- Previous message: N_E_O: "sniffing/cracking wepkeys in FreeBSD"
- In reply to: Daniel Miessler: "Re: Core Impact"
- Next in thread: Chris Byrd: "Re: Core Impact"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:52:32 +0000 To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
On 6/24/05, Daniel Miessler <daniel@dmiessler.com> wrote:
> Actually, while I think Metasploit is an impressive framework and use
> it often, it lacks a main feature that IMPACT has. Namely, IMPACT is
> able to do something they call "pivoting". This allows a tester to
> select an exploit in the GUI, launch it, and then upload the IMPACT
> agent to the newly compromised system.
I think you can come up with something similar using the Meterpreter
framework you can find in Metasploit.
The only difference here is that you don't have the agent ready to use,
but you have to develop it (lots of fun!) ;)
However IMPACT seems to be the most mature and feature
loaded framework you can ask for nowadays.
have a good day,
Daniele Milan
-- In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is. (Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut) GPG key: http://tinybyte.altervista.org/tinybyte.asc
- Previous message: N_E_O: "sniffing/cracking wepkeys in FreeBSD"
- In reply to: Daniel Miessler: "Re: Core Impact"
- Next in thread: Chris Byrd: "Re: Core Impact"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
