Re: VPN protocols
From: Chris Kuethe (chris.kuethe_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/22/04
- Previous message: John Forristel (SunGard-Chico): "RE: VPN protocols"
- In reply to: John Forristel (SunGard-Chico): "RE: VPN protocols"
- Next in thread: Keith Pachulski: "RE: VPN protocols"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:48:57 -0700 To: "John Forristel (SunGard-Chico)" <John.Forristel@sungardbi-tech.com>
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:04:16 -0800, John Forristel (SunGard-Chico)
<John.Forristel@sungardbi-tech.com> wrote:
> GRE and ESP are protocols, not ports, so they are transported through on
> configured ports. In Cisco, you permit gre and esp through for the VPN
> traffic.
No, they are not transported on configured ports. They are transported
via IP, and your IP stack is informed of this by the 10th byte of the
IP header. In tcpdump parlance:
(ip[9] = 47) GRE
(ip[9] = 50) ESP
-- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
- Previous message: John Forristel (SunGard-Chico): "RE: VPN protocols"
- In reply to: John Forristel (SunGard-Chico): "RE: VPN protocols"
- Next in thread: Keith Pachulski: "RE: VPN protocols"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|