RE: Port Scanning.
From: Piskovatskov, Alexey (Alexey.Piskovatskov_at_bindview.com)
Date: 12/13/04
- Previous message: GDreelin: "RE: Laptop Considerations"
- Maybe in reply to: Faisal Khan: "Port Scanning."
- Next in thread: rzaluski: "RE: Port Scanning."
- Reply: rzaluski: "RE: Port Scanning."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:23:59 -0600 To: "Faisal Khan" <faisal@netxs.com.pk>, <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
There's good document by NIST on this subject:
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-42/NIST-SP800-42.pdf
Because nature of the scanners to report false positives/negatives,
using multiple vendors and/or free tools is appropriate.
Best,
Alexey
-----Original Message-----
From: Faisal Khan [mailto:faisal@netxs.com.pk]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 8:47 AM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Port Scanning.
What's a good industry practise whilst doing port-scanning during a
pen-test.
Do you rely on the results of a single vendor's software or do you use
multiple softwares?
Also, with each OEM/vendor - do you scan once or twice?
I need to do a scan on a Class C Address if that matters in any way.
Faisal
Faisal Khan, CEO
Net Access Communication
Systems (Private) Limited
________________________________
Network Security - Secure Web Hosting
Managed Internet Services - Secure Email
Dedicated Servers - Reseller Hosting
Visit www.netxs.com.pk for more information.
- Previous message: GDreelin: "RE: Laptop Considerations"
- Maybe in reply to: Faisal Khan: "Port Scanning."
- Next in thread: rzaluski: "RE: Port Scanning."
- Reply: rzaluski: "RE: Port Scanning."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]