Crashing services with NMAP and/or SuperScan ?

Petr.Kazil_at_eap.nl
Date: 11/23/04

  • Next message: Rob Shein: "RE: Social Engineering ... ?" 
    To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:41:59 +0100

    > (Side question: Has anyone ever crashed a server when the dangerous
    scans
    > are disabled?)

    L.S.

    I'm doing a series of quickscans in divisions of a large organization. I
    intentionally don't go deep, I just scratch the surface. So we can find
    only bad security errors, nothing subtle.

    One step in the quickscan is a portscan of the internal network. I've tried
    both nmap and Superscan. This usually brings out a lot of unexpected mail
    services, ftp servers, low services, web management interfaces etc.

    With Superscan I seem to have blown out a switch. It went "red" on the HP
    Openview screen and didn't react to ping anymore. All the network traffic
    continued - fortunately :-) As of today the admins haven't been able to
    tell me what really happened. I haven't dared to try Superscan anymore -
    although I like it's output very much - especially it's checks for headers
    and anonymous FTP and SMTP.

    Yesterday I ran nmap -sS -sV -O ... There were no problems on Win2K and
    Unix machines, but on WinNT SP5 (!) machines I seem to have blown out :
    - one Oracle TNS Listener - however the admin said "everything continued to
    function"
    - 2 or 3 Storageworks EVA Secure Path services.

    Fortunately the admins were not upset. They looked through the services on
    the servers, looked which ones had gone "stopped" and set them back to
    "started".

    Question:
    Do you think that running nmap without the -sV -O options could avoid this
    and still give me enough information?

    These are always difficult situations - replications is not easy (I canot
    ask : "Can I run the scan again and see if the same thing hapens?"). I
    can't test all OS versions on my test network. I'm not even sure if I'm
    really to blame, it could even be coincidence ...

    Of course I asked (and re-asked) before my scan: What subnetwork can I scan
    and which IP's should I avoid? Answer: We don't expect any problems, just
    take our whole subnet.

    Your comments are very welcome.

    Greetings, Petr Kazil

  • Next message: Rob Shein: "RE: Social Engineering ... ?"