nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)"
From: Erik Myrold (emyrold_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/14/04
- Previous message: Chris Griffin: "CEH"
- Next in thread: Steve A: "FW: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Maybe reply: Steve A: "FW: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Maybe reply: Scott Stephenson: "RE: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 03:09:37 -0000 To: pen-test@securityfocus.com('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
I am having an issue with a nmap host discovery scan (nmap -sP x.x.x.x/24) that is responding for 0 through broadcast 255 when there are only 30 hosts on that subnet.
At this point I am not sure if it is the router or switch that is responding to the ping sweep.
What does this usually mean? There is no NAT and no filtering that I can tell, but this is not my forte'...
There are other subnets I can ping sweep with no problems...
Thanks!
- Previous message: Chris Griffin: "CEH"
- Next in thread: Steve A: "FW: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Maybe reply: Steve A: "FW: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Maybe reply: Scott Stephenson: "RE: nmap "Host x.x.x.x appears to be up" ... "(256 hosts up)""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]