RE: Client/Server application that does not authenticate users
From: Dinis Cruz (dinis_at_ddplus.net)
To: "'Brian Erdelyi'" <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:29:08 +0100
I knew of an web app that got the username for the user variable "Username"
Guess what would happen in you typed in the client workstation "Set
For guidelines check out the OWASP documents: Top 10
(http://www.owasp.org/documentation/topten.html), Testing guide
(http://www.owasp.org/documentation/testing.html), the ISO 17799 Project
(http://www.owasp.org/standards/iso17799.html) and the app sec FAQ
Hope this helps
.Net Security Consultant
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Erdelyi [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 13 August 2004 11:58
> To: Dinis Cruz; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: Client/Server application that does not authenticate users
> I am working with the vendor on this. Unfortunately,
> I was assured by the cendor that the application does
> authenticate users and uses accesscontrol lists to
> assign permissions. They claimed I was was using an
> uncommon interpretation of the term "authentication".
> The next level of support disagreed with my use of the
> term "vulnerability".
> The server does ask for a username (the client
> automatically forwards the Windows username of the
> currently logged on computer) but no password is
> requested or sent at any point. This is by design of
> the application (which from my perspective is
> seriously flawed for an application that allows users
> to sell and trade millions of dollars worth of bonds).
> I will give the vendor some time to analyse the
> description I have provided to them and respond.
> I'd like to provide some very specific suggestions and
> guidance on how other applications are designed and
> coded to authenticate users.
> Is there an RFC on secure programming?
> --- Dinis Cruz <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Quite common.
> > The other major mistake that most do is to rely on
> > the Client's GUI to
> > enforce the 'security boundaries' of the client
> > application (for example:
> > they rely on the fact that the user's GUI doesn't
> > have the functionality to
> > change passwords (including the administrators), so
> > if such a request is
> > made it must be from a valid source....)
> > But, the big question is: "what happens next?"
> > Are they going to tell their customers that their
> > data could had been (or
> > was) compromised?
> > Dinis Cruz
> > .Net Security Consultant
> > DDPlus
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!