RE: Limited vs full blown testing
From: Jerry Shenk (jshenk_at_decommunications.com)
Date: 06/25/04
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'R. DuFresne'" <dufresne@sysinfo.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:37:15 -0400
He SPECIFICALLY excluded DDOS. Of course, if you sit in on the network
with a battery of laptops and find a few amplifiers internally, you can
do a DDOS...that's why he excluded it. In fact, it was the VERY NEXT
sentence after the first sentence you snipped out. How about some more
basic DOS attempts. Doing that type of thing internally doesn't seem
very practical to me.
Now, about doing a DOS in a penetration test or vulnerability
assessment...sure, it makes sense.
-----Original Message-----
From: R. DuFresne [mailto:dufresne@sysinfo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:13 PM
To: Peter Wood
Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Limited vs full blown testing
[SNIP]
>
> We accept a brief excluding DoS attacks, as most clients just won't
support
> DoS testing. However we include appripriate caveats in our report and
> continue to suggest they do these tests.
>
I'm trying to understand the significance of DDOS testing and
importance.
Thing is, if you can spew packets fast enough, or make enough
connections
to consume the resources involved, you can take a site/serice down for
at
least the duration of the attack, even pipes as large as those of
akami<sp?> were proven to be susceptable in recent days. It's a given
vector of attack that we live with, a risk level we hope to avoid. But,
not something that gives away the insides of the network to thugs and
theives. No root shell and all that, which constitute a real threat, at
least in my mind. Perhaps I'm missing something that has come up in
recent years that redefines DDOS as something that is preventable and a
potential for something other then a blip, however long lasting the
attack, in service?
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
-- Johnny Hart
testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "RE: Limited vs full blown testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|