Re: RF code scanners
From: Mister Coffee (live4java_at_stormcenter.net)
Date: 06/18/04
- Previous message: Michael C. Roach: "RE: Starting up: What contracts, agreements, waivers, etc do you use?"
- In reply to: Richard Rager: "Re: RF code scanners"
- Next in thread: Richard Rager: "Re: RF code scanners"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:37:35 -0700 To: Richard Rager <kb8rln@penguinmaster.com>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 05:19:09PM -0600, Richard Rager wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Mister Coffee wrote:
>
> > That depends on what you're trying to do.
> >
> > Side note: http://www.radioreference.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=467
> >
> > Openers are decidedly susceptible to jamming...
> >
>
>
> All FCC class C devices are susceptible to jamming. Look at wireless
> alarm systems.
>
I wonder how many of these devices are designed to "Fail Open" when their receivers are overwhelmed. I don't imagine it would take much power to completely overload the front end of most garage door openers and the like.
The "safe" way would be to "fail closed" of course, but we all know how security conscious most of the manufacturers out there are.
Cheers,
L4J
- Previous message: Michael C. Roach: "RE: Starting up: What contracts, agreements, waivers, etc do you use?"
- In reply to: Richard Rager: "Re: RF code scanners"
- Next in thread: Richard Rager: "Re: RF code scanners"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
