RE: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements
From: Alvin Oga (alvin.sec_at_Mail.Linux-Consulting.com)
Date: 06/14/04
- Previous message: Denis Solaro: "Re: Nmap results in spreadsheet format"
- In reply to: Rusty Chiles: "RE: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Next in thread: Andrew A. Vladimirov: "Re: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Reply: Andrew A. Vladimirov: "Re: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:49:24 -0700 (PDT) To: Rusty Chiles <rustychiles@cox.net>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Rusty Chiles wrote:
> The following vendors all offer a wide variety of wifi antennas that could
> be used for pentesting.
> They aren't terribly expensive either:
>
> http://www.fab-corp.com
> http://www.hyperlinktech.com
> http://www.pacwireless.net
>
> If you are doing this professionally pay the extra money. If I paid for a
> site survey and a guy with a pringles can or tupperware container showed up
> I would be concerned with their testing ability.
you mean you want them holding this ??
http://zapchecker.com/rf_signal.html
-- pringles -- one can make or buy ....
-- tupperware -- one probably has to make it ...
- home made is good and bad, if they can explain why they
made it and all the RF antenna design issues that commercial
antenna will miss
c ya
alvin
- Previous message: Denis Solaro: "Re: Nmap results in spreadsheet format"
- In reply to: Rusty Chiles: "RE: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Next in thread: Andrew A. Vladimirov: "Re: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Reply: Andrew A. Vladimirov: "Re: antenna - Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]