RE: Hacking Demo and Test Lab

From: Victor Chapela (victor_at_sm4rt.com)
Date: 06/11/04

  • Next message: Mister Coffee: "Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"
    To: "'raza sharif'" <raza@raza.demon.co.uk>, <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:59:54 -0500
    
    

    I am not sure about VMWare, I also had some problems running demos
    consistently and decided to use a separate machine.

    I usually do my demos with a similar configuration XP -> 2000.

    A good 5 min sketch is:
    - get a remote shell using Jill, iis5hack or dcomexploit
    - You end up as NT Authority/SYSTEM in all cases, therefore you can add
    yourself as an administrator
    - connect to the admin$ share using your new credentials
    - dump the SAM file with pwdump3
    - crack some hashes using john
    - copy winvnc to system32
    - add your vnc password to the remote registry
    - install and start winvnc remotely
    - start a VNC session

    Even though you will rarely need to install vnc while pen testing, I have
    found that for demos it is a very good way to get the point through.

    Good luck

    Victor

    -----Original Message-----
    From: raza sharif [mailto:raza@raza.demon.co.uk]
    Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 6:42 AM
    To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Hacking Demo and Test Lab

    Hi Folks ,

    Im doing some advanced Hacking Demos for management and also Corporates etc.

    I have a installed windows 2000 server and iis 5.0 on VMWARE GSX server.

    Im using Webdav and other exploits that all basically should spawn a shell
    using netcat.

    Im using XP as my attacking machine.

    Prob at the moment is Netcat will not spawn a shell regardless of what i
    try.

    Any ideas ? i checked the install it is windows 2000 500.1295 no reference
    to service packs etc. it's a default install.

    Also what are good demo's etc to run to show real hacking on windows 2000 ,
    iis etc..that i can get to work

    thanks

    Raza

    Raza@raza.demon.co.uk


  • Next message: Mister Coffee: "Re: Wireless pentesting requirements"