RE: Email Pen-testing

From: Frank Knobbe (frank_at_knobbe.us)
Date: 03/24/04

  • Next message: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Bank Audit Best practices"
    To: "AJ Butcher, Information Systems and Computing" <Alex.Butcher@bristol.ac.uk>
    Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 01:10:00 -0600
    
    
    

    On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 10:01, AJ Butcher, Information Systems and
    Computing wrote:
    > IMHO, regular vulnerability assessment is usually the most useful approach
    > as it can identify the critical vulnerabilities that require fixing. Viewed
    > in such a light, penetration testing is probably only useful for proving a
    > political point (e.g. that someone is or isn't doing their job competently,
    > or that their budget is adequate or insufficient).

    Penetration tests not only test the technical defenses, but also the
    processes and people around it. One variation of a Penetration Test is
    an Incident Response Exercise to test the response capabilities of a
    client. You are less concerned about getting root but instead try to
    operate stealthy or in an otherwise defined pattern, attempting to
    penetrate, but allowing others to take notes of the response procedures
    of the clients incident response team.

    Pentests do sometimes occur only to prove a point with management. But
    more often than not, they are a valuable educational exercise, an
    eye-opener. Less political, but more along the lines of "oh, we didn't
    think about that". Anything that broadens and increases security
    awareness of a client is a good thing.

    Pentests are valuable, but as you correctly identified, they are useful
    to uncover things in depth, not in breadth. First-action pentests are
    almost always for political/funding or regulatory requirement purposes.
    They should be followed by vulnerability studies, otherwise not much
    will have been gained. Just like you, I prefer to do a vulnerability
    assessment first, raise the security posture, but then do a pentest to
    uncover those "things we haven't thought of" (from a client perspective)
    and to find weaks point in your defenses, and polish up the security
    posture. Repeat periodically.

    Pentests, vuln studies, incident response exercises, security awareness
    training and exercises, risk assessments, those are pretty much ongoing
    developments. I mean, a document classification system, or initial IR
    capability setup, you typically develop once, and then just tweak them
    over time. But assessments and exercises need to be done periodically.
    That's all part of the "security is a process" cycle. And the more we
    can educate and teach our clients along the way, the better.
     
    (I'm gonna shut up now since I'm probably preaching to the choir...)

    Regards,
    Frank

    
    



  • Next message: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Bank Audit Best practices"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest
      ... Security Assessment ... ... >> A Vulnerability Assessment should be a comprehensive look ... > Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: Security Audit
      ... You bring up some very good questions: :-) When I say vulnerability ... assessment, I should have added "Automated" to the beginning. ... Nessus is a great ... This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: Penetration Testing/Vulnerability Assessment
      ... Subject: Penetration Testing/Vulnerability Assessment ... I am in the process of writing Security Guidelines for the Solaris boxes ... > vulnerability assessment goes hand in hand with penetration testing. ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #165
      ... Tenable Security ... distribute, manage, and communicate vulnerability and intrusion detection ... Microsoft Internet Explorer MHTML Forced File Execution Vuln... ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #174
      ... This issue sponsored by: Tenable Network Security ... the worlds only 100% passive vulnerability ... MICROSOFT VULNERABILITY SUMMARY ... Novell Netware Enterprise Web Server Multiple Vulnerabilitie... ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)

  • Quantcast