RE: Email Pen-testing
From: Chris Hurley (churley_at_assureddecisions.com)
Date: 03/23/04
- Previous message: Kevin: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- In reply to: James Taylor: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- Next in thread: AJ Butcher, Information Systems and Computing: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:49:13 -0500 (EST) To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, James Taylor wrote:
>
> To drift slightly off topic... For me a vulnerability scan has much more value
> to most companies than a pen test. That is , of course, if you apply the
> principle that a vuln scan should be performed at each perimeter layer, against
> all hosts, then assess the risk by taking each vulnerability discovered in the
> context of the network as a whole.
I agree with the gist of your point, however I am assuming that by
"vulnerabillity scan" you are actually referring to a vulnerability
assessment. A scan is a valuable part of an assessment, however on it's
own it is generally only valuable for identifying signature based
vulnerabilities. A full assessment, on the other hand, if conducted
thoroughly, can identify areas of potential future exploitation that can
be pro-actively addressed.
Chris Hurley
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're a pen tester, but is google.com still your R&D team?
Now you can get trustworthy commercial-grade exploits and the latest
techniques from a world-class research group.
www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Kevin: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- In reply to: James Taylor: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- Next in thread: AJ Butcher, Information Systems and Computing: "RE: Email Pen-testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|