RE: Exhange 2003

From: Zach Forsyth (Zach.Forsyth_at_kiandra.com)
Date: 03/04/04

  • Next message: Rafael Ausejo Prieto: "RE: Standards for penetration testing"
    To: <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:04:07 +1100
    
    

    Is the PIX smtp fixup protocol enabled?
    I have seen some very weird things when investigating network issue and
    there is a PIX with smtp fixup somewhere in between.
    If it is enabled, then do a couple of tests with it switched off.

    Just a thought.

    Cheers

    Zach

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: John Swope [mailto:johns@akorn.net]
    > Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:09 PM
    > To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
    > Subject: RE: Exhange 2003
    >
    > All,
    >
    > I work for an enterprise email security company and saw
    > something rather odd just the other day and this might be related.
    >
    > I was troubleshooting a customer's mail environment, they
    > were an Exchange shop and our appliance is Unix based. I was
    > noticing a 5 second delay between when I telnetted to port 25
    > and when the Exchange server actually presented it's 220 banner.
    >
    > Odd, hosts were connected via 100 Base-T, exchange server was
    > not overloaded. No lost packets. What gives...
    >
    > Ran tcpdump -X -s1600 host exchange.customer.com
    >
    >
    > Notice, no restriction on ports or types of traffic just on host...
    >
    >
    > I noticed the Exchange server was performing 3 NBT broadcasts
    > to try to resolve the LMHOST name of my box. Naturally it
    > did not work because I'm a Unix box not running Samba.
    >
    > So, could the exchange server in your case be doing the same?
    > Would it explain the results? Is the PIX allowing all
    > traffic from Exchange to external network? I realize that I
    > was seeing broadcast traffic and one of the posts in the
    > thread mentioned the boxes are separated by a PIX, just
    > throwing this in as something worth checking...
    >
    > HTH,
    > BJ
    >
    > At 05:45 AM 03/03/04, Deniz CEVIK wrote:
    >
    > > Hi all,
    > >
    > >This host is behind the cisco pix firewall. I have scanned this host
    > >using several portscan tools. These tools show that only two
    > ports are
    > >open. (SMTP and POP3). Strange think is, if you don't
    > establish the TCP
    > >connection to one of these open ports, before run the
    > "nbtstat" command, you get nothing.
    > >But if you open a tcp connection and after that run nbtstat command,
    > >you can see the details of netbios information of machine.
    > >
    > >Nbtstat command is sending packets to udp 137 port of
    > destination. As
    > >far as I see, firewall is accepting udp packets, if there is an
    > >established tcp connection from same source to same
    > destination as in
    > >udp connection request. I think there is a configuration
    > problem in the customer firewall.
    > >For further analysis I requested firewall configuration and logs.
    > >
    > >Thanks for your helps.
    > >
    > >PS: HADXM is the hostname of the machine. I have modified some
    > >information in outputs before I posted the message.
    > >
    > >BR.
    > >
    > >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >From: jamesworld@intelligencia.com
    > >[mailto:jamesworld@intelligencia.com]
    > >Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 4:17 AM
    > >To: Deniz CEVIK
    > >Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com
    > >Subject: Re: Exhange 2003
    > >
    > >Did you try
    > >
    > >netstat -an
    > >
    > >And see what ports were listening?
    > >
    > >Is there a local IP filtering policy active? You mentioned
    > only 2 ports
    > >as being active 25 and 100. Perhaps there is a local IP policy only
    > >allowing those ports. Perhaps the port 100 was supposed to
    > be port 110
    > >for POP3 mail access and they typod the entry. Good of you to find
    > >their misconfiguration for them :-)
    > >
    > >Did you run fport (foundstone)? If you've never used fport,
    > you should
    > >add it to your arsenal.
    > >
    > >Hopefully HADXM is the username that you are using. If not,
    > look into
    > >the host being compromised.
    > >
    > >If you have more, post it to us.
    > >
    > >Cheers,
    > >-James
    > >
    > >At 08:29 03/02/2004, Deniz CEVIK wrote:
    > > >Hi All,
    > > >
    > > >While we are testing our customer network, we faced with
    > strange problem.
    > >We
    > > >are testing exchange 2003 server externally. When we
    > controlled open
    > > >services with port scan, I saw that only two ports (25 and
    > 100) are
    > > >shown
    > >as
    > > >open. Before I run the portscan, I have controlled the server with
    > >"nbtstat"
    > > >command of windows. It returned error messages as below.
    > > >
    > > >nbtstat -A EXCH_IP
    > > >
    > > >Local Area Connection:
    > > >Node IpAddress: [MY_MACHINE] Scope Id: []
    > > >
    > > > Host not found.
    > > >
    > > >After the port scan is finished, in order to see the banner
    > > >information of mail server, I opened the connection to
    > port 25 using
    > > >telnet command
    > >(telnet
    > > >EXCH_IP 25). Same time when I run "nbtstat -A" command
    > from another
    > > >window by mistake and I saw that below output.
    > > >
    > > >nbtstat -A EXCH_IP
    > > >
    > > >Local Area Connection:
    > > >Node IpAddress: [MY_MACHINE] Scope Id: []
    > > >
    > > > NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table
    > > >
    > > > Name Type Status
    > > > ---------------------------------------------
    > > > HADXM <1F> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > HADXM <00> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > HADXM <20> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > EXCHANGE <00> GROUP Registered
    > > > EXCHANGE <1C> GROUP Registered
    > > > EXCHANGE <1B> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > EXCHANGE <1E> GROUP Registered
    > > > HADXM <03> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > ADMINISTRATOR <03> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > EXCHANGE <1D> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > ..__MSBROWSE__. <01> GROUP Registered
    > > > HADXM <6A> UNIQUE Registered
    > > > HADXM <87> UNIQUE Registered
    > > >
    > > > MAC Address = MAC_ADDRESS_OF_EXCHANGE
    > > >
    > > >If there isn't any connection to open port of the server you can't
    > > >see this nbtstat outputs.
    > > >
    > > >Has any body faced with same situations before?
    > > >
    > > >BR
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > >------ Free 30-day trial: firewall with virus/spam protection, URL
    > > >filtering, VPN, wireless security
    > > >
    > > >Protect your network against hackers, viruses, spam and
    > other risks
    > > >with Astaro Security Linux, the comprehensive security
    > solution that
    > > >combines six applications in one software solution for ease of use
    > > >and lower total cost
    > >of
    > > >ownership.
    > > >
    > > >Download your free trial at
    > > >http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/Astaro_pen-test_040201
    > >
    > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > >------
    > >-
    > >
    > >
    > >-------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------
    > >---- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this
    > ad and get
    > >$545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10
    > >students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with
    > one of our
    > >expert instructors.
    > >Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of
    > >in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking
    > >lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess
    > the security of your organization.
    > >Visit us at:
    > >http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/InfoSecInstitute_pen-test_040303
    > >-------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------
    > >-----
    >
    >
    >

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
    Visit us at:
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Rafael Ausejo Prieto: "RE: Standards for penetration testing"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Outlook Problem with Exchange
      ... Microsoft Exchange Support Engineer ... The connection to the GC for Directory access, ... ports, see what ports the Information store is listening on etc, etc.. ... connect to the Exchange Server), nor can they RDP to the Exchange ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.applications)
    • Re: Outlook Problem with Exchange
      ... Exchange server that we can test with? ... The connection to the GC for Directory access, ... ports, see what ports the Information store is listening on etc, etc.. ... connect to the Exchange Server), nor can they RDP to the Exchange ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.applications)
    • Re: How Can Remote VPN Users Connect to our Exchange Server?
      ... Which ports would need to be open? ... >> connected via a VPN or in the same office as the exchange server. ... >> you dont need a VPN connection to the network that has the exchange server ... >> all you need is a high speed connection to the i.e cable modem DSL ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
    • Re: PIX troubles H.323 even with fixup disabled
      ... The PIX is configured not to block anything between these two ... ports are blocked. ... (Blocked ports tend to result in timeouts, ... ie. a long wait before the connection fails. ...
      (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
    • Rpc/Https Problem
      ... authenicate with my unsername and password because it connects to my ... global catalog (the connection even resolves the dns name of my gc). ... then I am given the "Exchange server is unavailable" error. ... I can even telnet to those ports with using my mail server's dns host ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)