RE: Service Identification

From: MARTIN M. Bénoni (benoni_martin_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/08/03

  • Next message: Martin Mačok: "Re: Service Identification"
    To: Bryan.Beaty@vector.com
    Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:19:50 +0000
    
    

    Hi!

    I had the same behavior with one my boxes (nmap sees an open port but not
    reply when attempting to connect to it). In my case, it was normal because I
    was running a honeypot on my target: I tried one of them (well a very basic
    one, NFR BOF under Window$ and IPtrap under Linux, but any "better" honeypot
    should do this, even a netcat I guess) asking these tools to monitor TCP/23,
    Nmap running against them found TCP/23 open (even if there were NO REAL
    service listenig on these ports)...but when telneting the target, no reply.

    So one possible reason of this in your case could be a simple honeypot or
    any tool like this running on your target.

    If you do not have physical access to the machine but a possible ssh for
    instance, it should be easy to check what's really going on it...

    >From: "Beaty, Bryan" <Bryan.Beaty@vector.com>
    >To: <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
    >Subject: Service Identification
    >Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:21:01 -0600
    >
    >I port scanned a box I am working on. I know the box is some form of
    >Linux. I see that port 23,25 and 53 are open. I can identify 53 as DNS.
    >Both NMAP and AMAP identify it as DNS.
    >
    >Port 23 and 25 are open but cannot be identified by AMAP or NMAP. When I
    >telnet <ip> 23 or 25 I get a blank screen. If I type I just get blank
    >spaces or underscore symbols on the screen.
    >
    >Does this mean the telnet and SMTP server have crashed?
    >Could it be that someone has installed some other service on these
    >ports?
    >How do you identify services that respond like this? Seems like I run
    >into this from time to time but I never have learned how to deal with
    >it.
    >
    >Any ideas what to do at this point? I do not have physical access to the
    >box.
    >
    >Thanks,
    >Bryan Beaty
    >
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Martin Mačok: "Re: Service Identification"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Help understanding a trace of an nmap scan
      ... so NMAP performs a full connect with the Syn ... -- Syn Ack -- Ack three way handshake, ... Note that NMAP is providing the target with everything it needs to know; ... Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • RE: nmap -S option
      ... target will reply too? ... nmap does not show open ports at end of scan. ... Need to secure your web apps? ... Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: Effectiveness of a Honeypot
      ... Subject: Effectiveness of a Honeypot ... script kiddies generally go after machines ... and don't neccesarily care about an interesting ... you could set up a prime target ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • RE: nmap os detection!
      ... There was just a thread about this on the honeypot mailling list ... you can also fake other OS's in the nmap scan. ... Links from honeypot threads: ... Bid for for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: nmap -S option
      ... If you specify a spoofed address, then replies from the target being ... nmap can not determine the open ports. ... Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. ...
      (Pen-Test)