Re: john the ripper
From: Jon Hart (warchild_at_spoofed.org)
Date: 12/03/03
- Previous message: Timo Schoeler: "Re: john the ripper"
- In reply to: fbr: "Re: john the ripper"
- Next in thread: Giacomo: "Re: john the ripper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:13:07 -0500 To: fbr <fbr@14x.net>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:38:31AM -0600, fbr wrote:
> The following benchmarks are all "FreeBSD MD5 [32/32]" tests done with john.
>
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
> 5903 c/s real, 5903 c/s virtual
>
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
> 4094 c/s real, 4355 c/s virtual
>
> Pentium III (Coppermine)
> 2455 c/s real, 2455 c/s virtual
>
> Can anyone provide any Athlon benchmarks?
>
> -Forrest
Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [32/32]... DONE
Raw: 4205 c/s real, 4455 c/s virtual
Thats on an Athlon XP 1800+, which is running at ~1500MHz.
When I'm cracking passwords that I suspect of being abnormally hard to
crack, I do my best to tweak my John run(s) accordingly. i.e., on
solaris I'll make the max password length 8 and the minimum something
like, oh, 6 or whatever local restrictions might be in place. I've also
had good results running 3 incremental cracks at once (on the same
machine if 4 processors are available, otherwise on 3 different
machines), using the "All", "Alpha" and "Digits" incremental cracks.
17 days is quite a long time, but keep going.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Timo Schoeler: "Re: john the ripper"
- In reply to: fbr: "Re: john the ripper"
- Next in thread: Giacomo: "Re: john the ripper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]