Re: Vulnerability scanners
From: Jeff Williams @ Aspect (@)
Date: 03/27/03
- Previous message: Rosado, Rafael (Rafael): "RE: Vulnerability scanners"
- Maybe in reply to: Dan Lynch: "Vulnerability scanners"
- Next in thread: Rosado, Rafael (Rafael): "RE: Vulnerability scanners"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jeff Williams @ Aspect" <jeff.williams@aspectsecurity.com> To: "Rob Shein" <shoten@starpower.net>, "'Dan Lynch'" <dan.lynch@placer.ca.gov>, <pen-test@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:02:48 -0500
I wasn't very clear in my first message on this. I was trying to say ONE
day per week, not full time. I think you're right.
Rob Shein wrote:
> I seriously question
> the notion that nessus scanning of a class C on a weekly basis is a
> full-time job.
> > That's at least a day a week of effort for someone (probably
> > more to generate a very nice report and summaries).
--Jeff
Jeff Williams
Aspect Security, Inc.
http://www.aspectsecurity.com
top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway.
SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses
and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much
junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial:
http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1
- Previous message: Rosado, Rafael (Rafael): "RE: Vulnerability scanners"
- Maybe in reply to: Dan Lynch: "Vulnerability scanners"
- Next in thread: Rosado, Rafael (Rafael): "RE: Vulnerability scanners"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|