which freebsd/apache is exploitable at all?
From: Ingram (Vail@gmx.net)Date: 08/21/02
- Previous message: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: "Looks like a Borderware firewall (was Re: Device fingerprinting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:00:37 +0200 (MEST) From: Ingram <Vail@gmx.net> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
greetings,
which Version of FreeBSD is really exploitable with the gobbles nosejob.c
exploit?
I tried it on several versions, but couldn´t manage to get shell. On OpenBSD
it´s
not a problem, i could even spawn a shell on 2.9 which is not "supported" by
nosejob/scalp.
I tried the following configs:
FreeBSD 4.4 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.22
FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.23
FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.24
FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.24
FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.25
I use the cygwin win32 port of the gobbles nosejob.
Could anybody point me to the right direction how to exploit the apache
chunked vuln
on FreeBSD and which version/parameters actually work?
thx in advantage
Ingram
-- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see: https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: "Looks like a Borderware firewall (was Re: Device fingerprinting)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
