Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure
From: Brad Mills (millsmiami@usa.net)Date: 05/29/02
- Previous message: John_Leitch@NAI.com: "PEN Testing a everchanging realm in apache"
- In reply to: Vanja Hrustic: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Next in thread: batz: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 12:33:02 EDT To: Vanja Hrustic <vanja@vanja.com>, pen-test@securityfocus.com From: Brad Mills <millsmiami@usa.net>
> It won't make any difference whatsoever. It's time to realize that 'we'
> don't make any difference.
>
> Vendors still don't react to problems, silly bugs are still present in
> software, admins still don't patch/upgrade, users still click on
> attachments and download screen savers.
Hmmm, unless I missed something, it was lists like this that generated
the recent Best-Buy wireless energy, which resulted in sub-actions,
eventually causing the company to stop and re-evaluate things.
As for sh*t software, vendors, typical end-users, etc., it will take
time, but if the catalyst weakens now, energy expended is lost. I say
continue the march.
just my .02,
/b
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: John_Leitch@NAI.com: "PEN Testing a everchanging realm in apache"
- In reply to: Vanja Hrustic: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Next in thread: batz: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|