Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure
From: Renaud Deraison (deraison@nessus.org)Date: 05/29/02
- Previous message: David Litchfield: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- In reply to: Alfred Huger: "Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Next in thread: Alfred Huger: "RE: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 01:16:06 +0200 From: Renaud Deraison <deraison@nessus.org> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:05:43PM -0600, Alfred Huger wrote:
> In brief they are now unloading limited details to the public about
> vulnerabilities they have notified vendors about.
I'm not surprised - three years ago, I said that would happen[1],
although I was expecting tighter cooperation between producers of
security holes (software vendors) and scanners.
When antivirus publishers have been accused of _secretely_ funding the
developement of new virii, they have been slammed by everyone. Oddly,
scanning for unknown vulnerabilities seems to be something worth to brag
about.
-- Renaud
[1] http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq-199907/0014.html
-- Renaud Deraison The Nessus Project http://www.nessus.org---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see: https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: David Litchfield: "Re: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- In reply to: Alfred Huger: "Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Next in thread: Alfred Huger: "RE: Scanners and unpublished vulnerabilities - Full Disclosure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|