Re: opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?
From: H Carvey (keydet89@yahoo.com)Date: 11/27/01
- Previous message: D V: "Re: Brute force .htpasswd"
- Maybe in reply to: Dented Halo: "opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?"
- Next in thread: Sacha Faust: "RE: opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Nov 2001 06:50:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20011127065014.13657.qmail@mail.securityfocus.com> From: H Carvey <keydet89@yahoo.com> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
In-Reply-To: <20011126232044.13099.qmail@mail.securityfocus.com>
>Only prob is finding info right now on SecureScanNX,
>no one seems ot be talking about it or much info,
>even google.com only brings up but a single page of
>hits. Interesting indeed...
Yes, it is. I just did a Google search using only
"securescannx" as the search term, and got several
hits back. I then went to the Vigilante homepage,
and from there found a Features site for
SecureScanNX as well as a technical whitepaper
that may be of use to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: D V: "Re: Brute force .htpasswd"
- Maybe in reply to: Dented Halo: "opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?"
- Next in thread: Sacha Faust: "RE: opinions on Vigliante's SecureScanNX for attack/pen work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
