xprobe 0.2
From: nobody (pentester@yahoo.com)Date: 10/26/01
- Previous message: Fernando Cardoso: "RE: Xprobe 0.0.2 Released"
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: xprobe 0.2"
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: xprobe 0.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <20011026142550.23172.qmail@web12008.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:25:50 -0700 (PDT) From: nobody <pentester@yahoo.com> Subject: xprobe 0.2 To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
All,
the new xprobe 0.2 works well - as far as it goes.
But - does anyone know if there is sufficient
difference between the tcp/ip signature of an NT
WORKSTATION and an NT SERVER OS.
Problem:
I need to (without making a windows connection via SMB
using pgms like gettype, winmsd, winffingerprint
etc..)
determine which Windows machines are running NTSERVER
OS.
Does anyone know or think the the tcp/udp packet
response from the NT SERVER will be different enough
from the NT WORKSTATION - so that I can tell them
apart. again - i cannot use the normal windows
connections to do this (no port 139 connections).
If there are any difference in the packet response -
then I could add an NT SERVER (does not matter if it
is NT or W2K) to the signature file for xprobe 0.3 ??
any help ?
thanks
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: Fernando Cardoso: "RE: Xprobe 0.0.2 Released"
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: xprobe 0.2"
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: xprobe 0.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|