Re: brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication
From: freehold@erols.comDate: 09/29/01
- Previous message: Denis Ducamp: "Re: brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication"
- In reply to: Jason binger: "brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <3BB633A4.16B1@erols.com> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 16:49:29 -0400 From: freehold@erols.com To: Jason binger <cisspstudy@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication
Lanman's challenge/response-based and it can cave when bruteforced.
There was a patch released some time ago because of a potential
Lophtcrack brute-force between IIs & clients w/ WEC (ME & anything with
Office2000). WEC didn't play nice with IE zone settings. Ditto a 2k
telnet client/ntlm problem (the client is 'optional' but enabled by
default I think). Ditto Netbios/ntlm. Windows sends the auths without
telling users, another example of 'transparency' I guess? ;)
My favorite ntlm-for-dummies: http://www.innovation.ch/java/ntlm.html
Missy
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: Denis Ducamp: "Re: brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication"
- In reply to: Jason binger: "brute-forcing NTLM HTTP Authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|