binary switching, no killing
From: Craig Holmes (Leusent@home.com)Date: 09/23/01
- Previous message: Stephan Barnes: "FW: RE Modem identification"
- Next in thread: Dom De Vitto: "RE: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: Dom De Vitto: "RE: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: binary switching, no killing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Craig Holmes <Leusent@home.com> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: binary switching, no killing Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:08:17 -0400 Message-Id: <01092223081701.00922@Weltall.gearbolt.net>
Hi Listmembers,
Me and some friends have created a small irc network in which we are
implementing ssl encryption between client and server. Our original ircd did
not have this feature and now our new ircds do. The problem is in upgrading,
the whole ircd must be killed and a new one started, which causes all clients
to drop. My question is, is it possible to almost "hijack" a process, and
switch the binary without losing the pid & tcp/ip connections? Is this a
crazy and impossible idea, or has it been done?
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Craig Holmes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: Stephan Barnes: "FW: RE Modem identification"
- Next in thread: Dom De Vitto: "RE: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: Dom De Vitto: "RE: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: binary switching, no killing"
- Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: binary switching, no killing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]