Re: Network Appliance
From: Gareth Bromley (gbromley@intstar.com)Date: 07/20/01
- Previous message: A.Friend: "Cisco Config Files?"
- Next in thread: Lehmann, Peter: "Re: Network Appliance"
- Reply: Lehmann, Peter: "Re: Network Appliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <3B5859BF.8FBF1FA6@intstar.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:18:07 +0100 From: Gareth Bromley <gbromley@intstar.com> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Network Appliance
Stacy Williams wrote:
> It's a customized Linux kernel that supports NTFS 4.0, 5.0 and NFS 3.0. Its
> managed remotely, there is a console connection but it's useless, and
> supports SSH, telnet, and RSH. File sharing is managed the exact same as the
> listed Files Systems above.
Strange I was under the impression that like the Caching engines they
where infact *BSD based (not sure if it was FreeBSD or OpenBSD).
Certainly very interesting to find out.
I remember in the older NetCaches you could after firmware upgrade get
to the boot levels prior to the caching software/layer, as it
occaisionally got confused about which scripts/programs to start. Can't
say I've seen this type of behaviour on the 5.x software though.
I ask some contacts at NetApp for some more info,
Cheers,
--Gareth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
- Previous message: A.Friend: "Cisco Config Files?"
- Next in thread: Lehmann, Peter: "Re: Network Appliance"
- Reply: Lehmann, Peter: "Re: Network Appliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|