RE: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way...
From: Daryl Davis (daryl_at_ultbingo.com)
Date: 11/03/05
- Previous message: amunchet_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..."
- In reply to: amunchet_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <incidents@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:29:21 -0800
I am still learning the "remote exploit auditor" but it does have a ssh
bruteforce on it.
Daryl R Davis
Digital Game Media, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amunchet@gmail.com [mailto:amunchet@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 5:08 AM
> To: incidents@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way...
>
>
> A while back, there was a very popular ssh brute forcing
> script floating around that used the tcl expect interpreter
> to impliment the brute forcing of the ssh client. This is
> probably a modified script that uses it over a variety of
> hosts and on success sends the necessary back door files.
> Also, someone probably has written a basic brute force
> generator for it, so dictionary only attacks will probably
> not succeed.
>
- Previous message: amunchet_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..."
- In reply to: amunchet_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]