Dismantling Botnets?

steven_at_lovebug.org
Date: 10/19/05

  • Next message: Jose Nazario: "Re: Odd Increase in Malformed Packets Aimed at Port 0"
    Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
    To: incidents@securityfocus.com
    
    

    Hello all,

    Every now and then there is discussion on the incidents mailing list about
    various backdoor/IRC bot trojans that effectively turn the machines into
    zombies. We have probably all come across infected clients and worked to
    remove the infection. Sometimes the infections are particularly nasty and
    involve multiple rootkits and spyware/adware installs that are nearly
    impossible to remove.

    These things have numerous ways to spread to include 0-day and old
    exploits, e-mail, SMB shares, instant messaging clients, and a number of
    other ways. Regardless of how it spreads, they generally result in a
    single outcome: a compromised machine that is under complete control of
    the attacker. This is obviously a major threat to a system's security and
    possibly to the whole network it is sitting on.

    So what is the appropriate action to take? Many of us will just remove
    the trojan or reblast/format the machine and be done with it. We might
    even take further steps for quicker detection and removal. Maybe we'll
    even go as far as to block some of the known/found networks on our
    firewalls. All of this provides for our best interest, but what about the
    rest of the Internet? Often there are tens of thousands of other infected
    clients on these servers. What do we do about the hacked servers and all
    of the thousands of infected clients? What is the right thing to do? Is
    there really that much that can be done?

    We can e-mail or call the abuse in an attempt to shut down the server in
    question. This probably works a little more than half of the time, but
    still doesn't solve the problem of the infected clients or tracking down
    the perpetrator. Do the ISPs/Hosting Server owners have responsiblity to
    attempt to remove the trojans from the infected machines? Many of the
    botnet trojans have uninstall/remove commands that they could
    theoretically issue. Maybe that is asking too much, but what about trying
    to catch the person running the botnet? How often do these ISPs/hosting
    providers actually provide any of this information to the authorities?
    Even then what can and will ever be done?

    Is there a place where current information can be given and it will truly
    be investigated and action will be taken? For example, in the past few
    days I have come across multiple botnets of 30,000-50,000 on each server.
    In one case I even suspect that the hosting provider might be facilitating
    the activity. For that reason alone I have avoided reporting this to the
    hosting provider. Is there a government source that actually takes the
    information, investigates it, and will actually make something happen? I
    think many of us have read the DDoS story on GRC.com before. This guy was
    actively being attacked and located the live botnet and still couldn't get
    the authorities to do anything (IIRC). Has anything changed since then?

    I know a lot of what I said is an on going debate, but I am really
    wondering if there is a good answer to all of this. Please write back if
    you have any thoughts on all of this and/or if you know of an entity to
    report to that cares. If anyone wants to discuss specific experiences
    with various botnets, also please feel free to contact me off the list you
    like.

    Thanks,

    Steven


  • Next message: Jose Nazario: "Re: Odd Increase in Malformed Packets Aimed at Port 0"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
      ... A Plan to Catch the Conficker Worm ... infected millions of machines worldwide, ... signs of infection. ... it presents itself to the wider network. ...
      (sci.military.naval)
    • Re: Why cant ISPs stop spam/virus ?!
      ... There is a scaling error and what should I look at a graph for? ... No, that would be "y", the number of machines already infected. ... >> numbers of infected machines should increase the rate of infection ... only in a quarantined area or if broadcasts were always to the same ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: shtyle.fm Virus, Worm or Trojan Horse?
      ... I don't see many viruses and I ... likewise spreading tyhe infection. ... One of the most notorious trojans ... | websites that purported to have the video. ...
      (alt.comp.anti-virus)
    • RE: TROJAN INFECTION - HELLLP!
      ... It is likely that you have an infection of SpySheriff or a similar fake ... Recently I've discovered that my PC is infected with Trojans. ... AVG deleted for me. ... But on restarting my system I was once again informed that my automatic ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Conficker A virus reinfecting patched machines
      ... are initiated and the patch at this time is a little like closing the ... So what I did is I reran the Symantec scan which found the infection on ... those machines. ... | unless someone restores a system restore point that is infected the ...
      (alt.comp.anti-virus)