RE: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods
From: Dave Dennis (dmd_at_speakeasy.org)
Date: 01/07/05
- Previous message: Chris Krough: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- In reply to: Paris E. Stone: "RE: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Next in thread: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Reply: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:54:06 -0800 (PST) To: "Paris E. Stone" <pstone@alhurra.com>
Run a firewall.
Hardware firewall preferably. If its Windows and its not firewalled, its
going to be owned.
Any Windows box is going to have unpatched potential open vulnerabilities.
the '20 minutes windows' concept applies. (an unpatched Windows host
takes 20 minutes to be infected on a broadband connection, and it takes longer
than that to download/patch a new Windows install)
If they're on broadband, and they are running Windows, they have to have a
firewall; hardware preferably, service pack 2 if possible, close all unnecessary
ports that Windows often ships with open still (135 Messenger, 137, 139, 445).
Otherwise running any A/V will still miss some things, A/V is essential, but A/V
without firewalling still gets infected sooner or later, and the browser/toolbar
ideas are great too, but only to prevent vectors introduced by the browser,
not to prevent being infected by drive-by portscanning, which is rampant
nowadays.
+-------------------------
+ Dave Dennis
+ Seattle, WA
+ dmd@speakeasy.org
+ http://www.dmdennis.com
+-------------------------
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Paris E. Stone wrote:
> Use Mozilla.
>
> If IE is a must, get the yahoo toolbar with anti-spy.
> &
> Spybot, have it immunize the system and block all bad pages & use the
> TeaTimer component.
>
> ~~~~~
> Paris E. Stone, "Linux Zealot"
> CISSP, CCNP, CNE, MCSE
> ~~~~~
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil,
> is for good men to do nothing.
> - Edmund Burke
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Illuminatus Master [mailto:illuminatus.master@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:37 PM
> To: incidents@securityfocus.com
> Subject: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods
>
> Hello List,
> I'm sure you all realize the growing threat of malware and spyware to
> Internet Explorer. It has been my experience that the initial
> infection and/or removel of an infection by anti-spyware products can
> permanently damage a windows workstation. This damage occurs in many
> forms and often leads too the workstation being reformatted and
> rebuilt before going back into service.
>
> A recent example is earlier this week, in spite of content filtering,
> a workstation was infected with "wintools", "mysearchtoolbar" etc. The
> tough part of this is that such malware has multiple instances/threads
> and renames system files like msconfig to resist removal. Often
> IE/Windows is so damaged it's more time effiecient to just replace the
> box and rebuild the infected one.
>
> My question is this, I'm batting around the idea of using Group Policy
> in our Active Directory to try and choke IE down to the point where
> such Malware has trouble installing itself. Has anyone here ever tried
> such as this with any degree of success?
>
> Other than Group Policy I'm also considering deploying an alternate
> web browser that isnt subject to malware infection but doing so
> complicates my patching/reporting routine for our security audits.
>
> I look forward to your comments and idea's.
>
> Thanks,
> massa
>
>
>
- Previous message: Chris Krough: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- In reply to: Paris E. Stone: "RE: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Next in thread: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Reply: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "Re: IE Malware / Spyware Control Methods"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
