Re: Incident investigation methodologies
From: FRCMSEC (FRCMSEC_at_terra.es)
Date: 06/04/04
- Previous message: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Maybe in reply to: Harlan Carvey: "Incident investigation methodologies"
- Next in thread: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Reply: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Harlan Carvey <keydet89@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:01:20 +0200
1º What you suggest is a modified version of Bugtraq.
2º People dont have time or dont want to make the effort of making a
documented report every time they post a message.
I dont know what rootkit is capable of doing what things. I only want
to know if it was a rootkit, if it is in my system and what it has done
in my system.
If you want to document your activities, it will be something similar
to forensic.
----- Mensaje Original -----
De: Harlan Carvey <keydet89@yahoo.com>
Fecha: Jueves, Junio 3, 2004 2:00 am
Asunto: Re: Incident investigation methodologies
> Gadi,
>
> > > While it's entirely possible that a rootkit
> > *could* do
> > > something, why not base what we do in fact, rather
> > > than in speculation, rumor, and paranoia?
> >
> > What you are suggesting, basically, is an
> > information sharing network
> > for different attack descriptions and information?
> >
> > A forensic dictionary? :)
>
> Admittedly, I may not have been as absolutely clear as
> I could have, but I really don't see where you were
> able to infer such a thing - particularly given the
> title of the post.
>
> To try again...what I'm suggesting is a documented,
> verifiable, repeatable methodology for incident
> response. I'm aware that the implemented methodology
> will have to specific to the platform (ie, Windows,
> Linux, *nix, *BSD, etc). I'm also aware that the
> framework will have to be flexible enough to allow new
> information to be incorporated.
>
> Hopefully, that's clear enough for a start...
>
- Previous message: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Maybe in reply to: Harlan Carvey: "Incident investigation methodologies"
- Next in thread: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Reply: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Incident investigation methodologies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|