RE: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?
Ben.Vaughn_at_united.com
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Dr0idb0y: "FW: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Maybe in reply to: a55mnky_at_yahoo.com: "Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:28:52 -0600 To: a55mnky@yahoo.com, incidents@securityfocus.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Just to clarify -- this problem occurs on the machines you *scanned*
or the machines you *installed* NMAP on?
Ben
- -----Original Message-----
From: a55mnky@yahoo.com [mailto:a55mnky@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:32 AM
To: incidents@securityfocus.com
Cc: a55mnky@yahoo.com
Subject: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?
Not sure if this is the best list for this, but I am in a bit of a
jam.
I just downloaded the new NMAP v. 3.50 and ran it on my internal
network. My IT manager is freaking out. He says my scan replaced
mstask.exe on the machines I scanned.
Anybody else seen this behavior?
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- -----
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Comment: Ben Vaughn - WHQSE
iQA/AwUBQD+2OBZLb6w18b7GEQIiQACfcdjnNrnx2m0bJqzA9PXAX6YJ2KEAoOAE
QmSqmSZ/bkSEkke7/3UCz9Oc
=Glyz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Dr0idb0y: "FW: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Maybe in reply to: a55mnky_at_yahoo.com: "Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
