Re: Releasing patches is bad for security
From: james (jamesh_at_cybermesa.com)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: aeonflux: "Re: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- In reply to: ELLIS, STEVEN: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Next in thread: Meritt James: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <incidents@securityfocus.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:58:25 -0700
Further, we cannot blame software vendors for releasing buggy code when we
accept the known 'features' and pay for it.
I disagree. Monopoly status means the playing field is not level.
The usual PC user still mostly has no choice of OS for OEM
systems. You cannot blame the user for choosing a buggy OS
when OEM's do not make other OS available.
Do remember it is well documented the strong arm tactics MS uses the make OEM's
only load MS OS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: aeonflux: "Re: Nmap - 3.50 changes mstask.exe?"
- In reply to: ELLIS, STEVEN: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Next in thread: Meritt James: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]