RE: Releasing patches is bad for security
From: Ross M. W. Bennetts (rbennett_at_une.edu.au)
Date: 02/26/04
- Previous message: james: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- In reply to: mgotts_at_2roads.com: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Next in thread: Brian Taylor: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Reply: Brian Taylor: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <incidents@securityfocus.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:39:10 +1100
> The vulnerability was discovered by Eeye Digital Security in July 2003 but
> no exploits were produced until three days after Microsoft's patch became
> available.
[Ross M. W. Bennetts]
But if a hacker did produce an exploit wouldn't he/she be more likely to use
it surreptitiously for their own private purposes and then only release it
to the kiddies on the net after the patch has been released?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: james: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- In reply to: mgotts_at_2roads.com: "Re: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Next in thread: Brian Taylor: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Reply: Brian Taylor: "RE: Releasing patches is bad for security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|