best defense (was: Re: Novarg
From: Meritt James (meritt_james_at_bah.com)
Date: 01/29/04
- Previous message: Duston Sickler: "RE: Novarg"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Novarg"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "Re: best defense (was: Re: Novarg"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: best defense (was: Re: Novarg"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:30:07 -0500 To: "Greg A. Woods" <woods@weird.com>
I disagree with Greg's statement and agree with Jonathan. You cannot
make something foolproof because fools are so ingenius.
Jim
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
>
> [ On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 12:05:26 (-0500), Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: Novarg
> >
> > The best defense to viruses like this is user education.
>
> No, the _best_ defense against viruses and worms, especially the e-mail
> borne ones, is to not allow your users to run known vulnerable software
> in the first place.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Duston Sickler: "RE: Novarg"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Novarg"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "Re: best defense (was: Re: Novarg"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: best defense (was: Re: Novarg"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]